Find out why a top-ten mortgage lender with a proprietary loan origination system (LOS) needed to convert from a legacy document platform.
The comment period was extended once, and expired on August 2nd, so now we await publication of the final rule. Many of the requirements would take effect six months from the final rule’s effective date.
The Rule has been in place since 2003, and implements the GLBA’s requirement on financial institutions to implement and maintain a comprehensive information security program to protect consumer personal and financial information. In its current form, the Rule permits financial institutions to take a flexible approach to implementation that takes into account the size and complexity of the institution, the scope of services offered, and the sensitivity of consumer information held.
The proposed rule-making adds specific requirements that would apply in any security program implementation, some of which are similar to the requirements imposed on state-licensed or supervised financial institutions by the New York Department of Financial Services cybersecurity regulations, the final portion of which took effect earlier this year. The requirements could add to the administrative burden for covered entities that currently use other or less detailed controls to meet current privacy requirements. Among the proposed specific requirements are the following:
Very small financial institutions with information on fewer than five thousand consumers would be exempt from the risk assessment, continuous monitoring, incident response plan and board of director reporting requirements.
In this blog post concerning legal and regulatory matters of interest to the mortgage industry, Sandler Law Group (SLG) provides general information and industry observations that are not motivated by or concerned with a particular past occurrence or event, or a specific existing legal problem of which SLG is aware. Nothing published herein is intended to constitute legal advice and the use of the blog post by a reader shall not give rise to an attorney-client relationship with SLG. SLG expressly disclaims any representation of accuracy or reliability as to the content of this blog post, as well as any obligation to maintain such content over time or to ensure it is free from errors. Brad Cope is the attorney responsible for the SLG content of this blog post. The attorneys of SLG are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization.
Find out why a top-ten mortgage lender with a proprietary loan origination system (LOS) needed to convert from a legacy document platform.
Learn more about the Goals Module and its key monitoring and reporting features.
Learn about the changes of state consumer protection and the responsibility of financial services institutions to pursue operational excellence and a culture of compliance.